Legal Opinion
Ruth Clark and Charles E. Bunker, and Cross-Appellants v. The City of Los Angeles, and Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1981No. 79-3103, 79-3121PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
The appellants, City of Los Angeles (“the City”) and the Los Angeles Police Department (“the LAPD”) appeal from a judgment of $60,000.00 entered on a jury verdict in favor of the appellees, Ruth Clark and Charles E. Bunker. At trial Clark and Bunker asserted that the appellants selectively enforced the law, denied due process, and conspired to deny appellees Clark and Bunker’s Civil Rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3). Appellees cross-appeal, claiming that a portion of the zoning laws is unconstitutionally overbroad. We reverse the verdict and damage…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- William R. And Lorna E. Hall v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Gregory Foster, Johnnie Lee Gibson, Billy Jackson, Ronald H. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," and Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Paddack v. Dave Christensen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.