Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Parsley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. There is no coverage under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act unless there is a relation of employer and employee. Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co., 174 Ga. 525 (163 SE 159). “In determining whether or not the relationship of master and servant prevails in a compensation case, the same principles that exist under the common law obtain.” Travelers Ins. Co. v. Clark, 58 Ga. App. 115, 121 (197 SE 650). Where there is a relationship of independent contractor and contractee no coverage is afforded. Richards v. Marco Realty Co., 57 Ga. App. 242 (194 SE 880). 2. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Cooper v. Dixie Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Travelers Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Poss Bros. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Malcom v. SudderthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanders Truck Transportation Co. v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- International Indemnity Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Mitchell v. Burden Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- International Indemnity Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985