Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Fyrac Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Docket No. 91, Calendar No. 37,240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1924, by means of many letters and telegrams, defendant contracted to employ plaintiff for three years, as district sales manager to organize and direct a sales force of eight or more men in the vending of spotlights. See 259 Mich. 242. Defendant having prevented performance of the contract by him after a few days’ work, plaintiff brought this action for damages. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff for his expense in moving from Detroit to Boston and directed a verdict against him on his claim for loss of earnings. Plaintiff reviews.

Plaintiff’s compensation was to have been on a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callender v. Myers Regulator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shapiro v. Fyrac Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kingsley Associates, Inc., Cross-Appellee. v. Del-Met, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Benfield v. HK Porter Company, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Shapiro v. Fyrac Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API