Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Fyrac Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 36,386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is an action for breach of a three-year contract of employment. The court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that the contract was void under the statute of frauds (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13417), because it did not specify the period of its duration.

The contract consists of a series of letters and telegrams. -Defendant, located at Rockford, Illinois, advertised for a sales manager. Plaintiff, living and employed in Detroit, answered the advertisement. Extended correspondence ensued, and, with personal interviews, resulted in plaintiff resigning his position, arranging to sell…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. Fyrac Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API