Legal Opinion
Board of Trustees of Sinclair Community College District v. Farra
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2010No. 23340PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellants, Donald and Sharon Farra, appeal from a judgment denying their motion for attorney fees that were allegedly incurred as a result of, and in the course of defending, an appropriation action between the Farras and the Board of Trustees of Sinclair Community College District (“Sinclair”). The Farras contend that attorney fees are appropriate under Section 19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, or pursuant to the amended version of R.C. 163.21(C)(1), which became effective on October 10, 2007.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Wilborn v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Proctor v. Kewpee, 1-08-03 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitt Sturtevant, L.L.P. v. NC Plaza L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Landis v. William Fannin Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011