Legal Opinion

Marriage of Quade v. Quade

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1985No. C5-84-1251PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellant David Quade disputes the property division ordered by the trial court in this dissolution action. He also disputes the order awarding attorney’s fees to respondent Bonnie Quade. We affirm.

FACTS

This dissolution proceeding commenced in March 1983. Trial commenced on November 21, 1983 and was completed on December 2, 1983. Additional testimony was taken from a court-appointed expert in April 1984 concerning the value of the liabilities of the companies owned by David.

On April 17, 1984, the court issued its first Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Borchert v. BorchertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Swanson v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Marriage of Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maher v. MaherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Karon v. KaronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Smolecki v. SmoleckiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API