Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. 342 Madison Avenue Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Angela Mazzarelli, J.), entered April 20, 1994, denying defendant 342 Madison Avenue’s motion for summary judgment, is unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed, with costs and disbursements payable to defendant. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint, with costs.

Plaintiff insurer’s subrogor Chipp of New York leased space in a building from defendant. The lease between the parties required Chipp to obtain insurance for the premises covering defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kyong Nam Chang v. General Accident Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. E.E. Cruz & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Buchbinder Tunick & Co. v. Manhattan National Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Utica Mutual Insurance v. Watertown Industrial Center Local Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. VBH Luxury, Inc. v. 940 Madison Associates LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API