Legal Opinion

United States v. Crespo

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1994No. Crim. 3:CR 94-062-02PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CONABOY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion For Suppression of Evidence (Doc. No. 72). The Government has responded to the motion. We have carefully reviewed their respective memorandums of law. For the reasons stated below, we will deny the motion.

BACKGROUND

Rosa Marraro Crespo is charged in the same indictment with her half-brother, Nestor Ariel Soto, (Counts 1 and 2), as well as Sharon Forte, (Counts 1, 3, 6 and 7), and her children, Annetta (Counts 1, 4 and 8), and Brian Forte (Count 3). The Fortes entered guilty pleas in this case on June…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Ruby, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API