Legal Opinion

Centex Homes v. Financial Pacific Insurance Company

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01284Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 CENTEX HOMES, Case No. 2:19-CV-1284 JCM (VCF) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 FINANCIAL PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 11 12 Defendant(s). 13 14 Presently before the court is defendant Arch Specialty Insurance Company’s (“Arch”) 15 motion for determination of good faith settlement. (ECF No. 96). Defendant St. Paul Fire and 16 Marine Insurance Company (“Travelers”) responded in opposition. (ECF No. 105). Arch replied. 17 (ECF No. 114). 18 Under Nevada law, the determination of whether a settlement is entered in “good faith”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. The Doctors Co. v. VincentNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re MGM Grand Hotel Fire LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1983
  4. Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. DavidsonNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Otak Nevada, Llc v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API