Legal Opinion

Einhorn v. P. Derby & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 8, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Moses Einhorn against P. Derby & Co. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff has recovered for services which he claims he rendered for the defendant in procuring a person ready, willing, and able to enter into a lease for a store in Canal street upon terms and conditions agreed upon between the defendant and the proposed lessee. [1] In order to recover for services as a broker, the plaintiff must show that he was actually employed by the defendant. [2] He alleges in his complaint that he was employed to procure a lessee upon terms and conditions to be agreed upon, but I fail to find any evidence sufficient to sustain a finding that he was employed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. American Machine & Foundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Miller v. Waclark Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Einhorn v. P. Derby & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Howsley v. Corona Security Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API