Brady v. American Machine & Foundry Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The American Machine and Foundry Company, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiffs, entered on the 7th day of January, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J. :
This is an action to recover commissions which the plaintiffs claim to have earned as real estate brokers in effecting the lease of certain factory property in Brooklyn, from the American Machine *268and'Eoundry Company, the defendant, to the May hew Dynan- Silk Company. To justify a. recovery in their behalf it. was. essential 'for the plaintiffs to establish an employment. by the defendant. This, I think, they have failed to do. The evidence goes- no further than to show that the plaintiff Brady, at. the- instance of a person who he himself denominates his “ client,”,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Fowler v. HoschkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Martin v. BlissNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- C. H. Diamond & Co. v. HartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ballentine & Boone v. MercerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Barrett v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Southack v. IrelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Einhorn v. P. Derby & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- Veatch v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.