Canton-Hughes Pump Co. v. Llera
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William E. Day, Judge. Action by Manuel Elera against the Canton-Hughes Pump Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William E. Day, Judge. Action by Manuel Elera against the Canton-Hughes Pump Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. In an action brought by Llera, as plaintiff, and founded upon a judgment which had been rendered for him and against the Pump Company, by the Municipal Court, of New York City, the District Judge directed a verdict in plaintiff’s favor, leaving to the jury only the computation of interest; and verdict and judgment were rendered for $4,317. The Pump…
1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). No
question is made as to the rightfulness of the judgment below, to the extent that it covers the $69.27, and costs and interest, being the amouiit of the money judgment actually entered by the New York *212court. The question is whether that court adjudicated the existence of the whole counterclaim substantially as alleged; and since jurisdiction of the person and, in a primary way, of the subj ect-matter, by the New York court, is clear, and since the judgment as entered does not, in terms, find the $3,950 indebtedness, the question of res judicata reduces…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Warren v. StoddartSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Union & Planters' Bank v. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Geracy, Inc. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Ford v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Louisiana Sulphur Carriers, Inc. v. Gulf Resources & Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.