Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1986No. 85-27PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These issues are presented on appeal:(1) Whether the action, a suit on a promissory note, was barred because it had previously been litigated by the same parties, or because the issue presented in this action could have been litigated in a prior proceeding.(2) Whether an affidavit filed in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this cause complied with the requirements of Rule 56 (e), Ala.R.Civ.P.(3) Whether the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant the defendant's request for a continuance to allow him to secure affidavits in opposition to the motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. First Ala. Bk. of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Thompson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Marsh v. MarshCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Ex Parte Guerdon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Hutchins v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crowl v. Kayo Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Bannister v. EubanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BiggerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Bakos v. WilkMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API