Legal Opinion

Bakos v. Wilk

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 19, 1987Published

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

This case raises the question of whether a subsequent action on a contract is barred by considerations of issue preclusion when two promissory notes that were arguably executed as part of the “same transaction” are overdue and an action is sought to be brought on the second note after the plaintiff has secured judgment on the first note.

The factual background out of which the res judicata assertions arise is as follows.

In the trial court, the plaintiff brought an action of contract seeking to recover the sum of $11,958.63, the balance assertedly due on a promissory note of a corporation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Bradford v. RichardsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McSorley v. Town of HancockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API