Cromie v. Florez, Incorporated
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
This is an appeal by the employer and the insurer from an award of $1,000 to the State treasury for the benefit of the second-injury fund made by the compensation commission of the department of labor and industry in accordance with the provisions of the workmen’s compensation law. See Act No. 10, pt. 2, § 8a, Pub. Acts 1912 (1st Ex. Sess.), as added by Act No. 245, Pub. Acts 1943 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 8424-1, Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 17.158 [1]).
David J. Cromie, deceased, who left no dependents, was employed as a night watchman by defendant Florez, Inc., a photographic studio located…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Chaudier v. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Marman v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Riley v. KohlenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Rector v. Ragnar-Benson, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wiltse v. Borden's Farm Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Fries v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Croff v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Zytkewick v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Zytkewick v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954