Legal Opinion

Cromie v. Florez, Incorporated

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1947No. Docket No. 45, Calendar No. 43,562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

This is an appeal by the employer and the insurer from an award of $1,000 to the State treasury for the benefit of the second-injury fund made by the compensation commission of the department of labor and industry in accordance with the provisions of the workmen’s compensation law. See Act No. 10, pt. 2, § 8a, Pub. Acts 1912 (1st Ex. Sess.), as added by Act No. 245, Pub. Acts 1943 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 8424-1, Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 17.158 [1]).

David J. Cromie, deceased, who left no dependents, was employed as a night watchman by defendant Florez, Inc., a photographic studio located…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Chaudier v. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Marman v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Riley v. KohlenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rector v. Ragnar-Benson, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiltse v. Borden's Farm Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Fries v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Croff v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Zytkewick v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Zytkewick v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API