Croff v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
Part 2, § 1, of Act No. 10, Pub. Acts 1912 (1st Ex. Sess.), the original enactment of the workmen's compensation act, read as follows so far as material to this case:
"If an employee * * * receives a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, * * * he shall be paid compensation." 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8417 (Stat. Ann. § 17.151).
This provision has been amended only once (by Act No. 245, Pub. Acts 1943) and it now reads as follows:
"An employee, who receives a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, * * * shall be paid compensation." Comp. Laws…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Hagopian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Samels v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Anderson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Kasarewski v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.