Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Chaney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 97-DR-1197; A108878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This appeal arises from guardianship and child custody proceedings that were consolidated for trial. The trial court denied father’s petition for custody of his biological child and ordered that the child continue indefinitely under the guardianship of mother’s uncle and his wife (respondents).1 Father appeals. We reverse and remand.

Child was born on July 2, 1990. Father and mother were not married, but father had accompanied mother to prenatal medical appointments, attended the birth and lived with mother and child for 10 months. At that point, father began a six-and-a-half year period of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. AlvordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. McComas v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middleton v. ChaneyOregon Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API