Abbott Laboratories v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
In this patent infringement case the defendant relies upon the prior written opinions of counsel that its product would not infringe plaintiff’s patent. Such reliance is permitted as a defense to a charge of willful infringement but is not required. Machinery Corp. v. Gullfiber, 774 F.2d 467, 472 (Fed.Cir.1985). Defendant produced three such opinions in response to a discovery request but refused to produce all opinions asserting work product and attorney-client privilege. It- specifically said it was “not waiving any ... privilege or ...…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- MacHinery Corporation of America v. Gullfiber Ab, Gullfiber International and Marvin SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- XYZ Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Golden Valley Microwave Foods, Inc. v. Weaver Popcorn Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Micron Separations, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.