Legal Opinion

Epple v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1950No. 34718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs commenced an action to enjoin the defendants from the use of a driveway and garage. Judgment was for the defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the question presented on the appeal has become moot by reason of a conveyance of the property and that the appeal is for delay only. This court called for a response to the motion to dismiss and none has been filed.

We have held that the Supreme Court will not attempt to determine abstract, hypothetical, or moot questions, but, where it is made to appear that the questions brought up…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. James I. Barnes Const. Co. v. HargroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Harden v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Hudson v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Campbell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. Hanna Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API