Auffmordt v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37866.
1Opinion of the Court
¿SKY,
Presiding Judge, delivered tbe opinion of the court: SST merchandise in question consists of silk crapes in the piece, Varying in width from 19 to 42 inches. The wide goods were assessed *57for duty as veilings while the narrower goods were assessedfor duty as trimmings, both at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1913. Both classes of goods are claimed by the importers to be dutiable at 45 per cent ad valorem under the general provision for woven fabrics of silk in paragraph 318 of the same act. The narrower widths of crape in question are chiefly used in making…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Robinson v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Naday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966