Legal Opinion

Loewenthal v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 8, 1911No. 499; No. 500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, G. A. 6909 (T. D. 29761).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The two cases were heard together, and involve merchandise which consists of narrow woven silk fabrics from half an inch to 1{* inches in width showing original designs in various colors and patterns. They were assessed for duty at the rate of 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 390 of the act of 1897. They are claimed to be dutiable at the rate of 50 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 391 of the same act.

The material portions of the paragraphs in question are as follows:

390. Laces, and articles made wholly or in part of lace, edgings, insertings, galloons, chiflón or other flouncings,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drew v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Auffmordt v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Van Raalte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API