Legal Opinion

Houston v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1909No. Nos. 16,428—(175)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Morrison county to cancel a certain deed from defendant to plaintiff, to declare that defendant was trustee of the legal title to the land described for the use and benefit of plaintiff, and that defendant be decreed to convey the legal title to plaintiff, without reservation, exception or easement, and to recover $1,074.40. The complaint in substance alleged the facts stated in the opinion and that plaintiff had demanded a rescission of the…

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Morrison county to cancel a certain deed from defendant to plaintiff, to declare that defendant was trustee of the legal title to the land described for the use and benefit of plaintiff, and that defendant be decreed to convey the legal title to plaintiff, without reservation, exception or easement, and to recover $1,074.40. The complaint in substance alleged the facts stated in the opinion and that plaintiff had demanded a rescission of the agreement and a return of the money paid. The answer, inter alia, alleged that the plaintiff entered into the agreement…

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, .1.

The real estate involved in this action was situated in Morrison county, within the indemnity limits of the grant made by the United States-to the territory of Minnesota March 3, 1857 (11 St. 195), for the purpose of aiding the construction of certain railroads, and also within the indemnity limits of the grant made to the state- of Minnesota- for the same purpose by act of -congress March 3,- 1865 (13 St. 526, c. 105), as amended by-act of March 3, 1871 (16 St. 588,. c. 144). The interest of the state was conferred upon the Western Railroad Company of Minnesota by act of the state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakeman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  2. Perkins v. TrinkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Swedesboro Loan & Building Ass'n v. GansNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Erkens v. NicolinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Grand Lodge v. TowneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Lindquist v. GibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Forest Lake State Bank v. EkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API