Legal Opinion

Holsey Appliance Company v. Burrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1955No. 36467PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This is a claim presented to the State Industrial Commission by Lucille Faye Burrow, widow, in behalf of herself and the minor child of Tommy Richard Burrow, hereinafter referred to as Burrow, who was killed by electrocution when he came in contact with a high voltage electric line while installing a television aerial or antenna on a dwelling in Lawton, Oklahoma, in the course of his employment by petitioner Holsey Appliance Company. An award was made under the Death Benefits provision of 85 O.S.1951 § 1 et seq., for the maximum amount, $13,500. This proceeding is brought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Griffin v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Switzer Adv. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. City of Hobart v. WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  2. Himes v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Hissom Memorial Center v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Leavitt v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  5. Oklahoma City v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API