Legal Opinion

Abitbol v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2008No. S-07-0118, S-07-0186PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Rhonda Abitbol asserts error in the amount of presentence incarceration credit awarded in two criminal cases in which the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case in No. S-07-0118 (District Court No. 16623) for entry of a new judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Abitbol presents the following issue for our review:

Did the trial court impose an illegal sentence when it denied Ms. Abitbol credit for time served for: (1) presentence incarceration after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Manes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wayt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Weedman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Despain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Benjamin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hagerman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Terry Smith v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API