Legal Opinion
Post v. Albert Frank & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Guriam.
The action was brought to recover the price alleged to have been agreed to be paid for certain advertising under the following order:
*131“ Hew York City, Aug. 20, 1909. “ Publisher, Paper Mill & Wood Pulp Hews,, Hew York:
“ Please insert the following order:
Title of Position • / Number Client Advertisement Space Time Rate 3808 ...... Schlisische Cellulose, etc. 5 in. Every 3 weeks for 15 beg. at once Good §229.50 less 2% cash 15 days
“ Important :
“ If rate or space is incorrect Write us at once, and we will be governed according to your acceptance. Copies of each publication must be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. Allen Kingston Motor Car Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Mendell v. WillyoungNew York Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander Hamilton Institute v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
- Hollidge v. Gussow, Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Hollidge v. Gussow, Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933