Legal Opinion

Neuhaus v. McGovern

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 12, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Final judgment unanimously reversed without costs and matter remanded for a new trial limited to the issue of whether *614tenants exercised their option to purchase the subject premises.

On December 7, 2000, after landlord purchased tenants’ premises at a mortgage foreclosure sale, the parties entered into a three-year lease, and tenants executed a $37,000 promissory note for an identical period. A lease rider gave tenants a purchase option, exercisable 90 days after the lease’s execution (the option clause nevertheless implies that the option is exercisable on or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Barbarita v. ShillingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Fulgenzi v. RinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Galapo v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Sid Farber Hempstead Corp. v. BuckleySuffolk County District Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Osborne v. MoutafisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API