Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Moutafis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 27, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Landlord commenced the instant commercial summary holdover proceeding to recover possession of the premises. Absent the parties’ contrary intent, the purchase contract, executed before the commercial lease expired, merged the landlord-tenant relationship into that of vendor-vendee in possession (Barbarita v Shilling, 111 AD2d 200, 201-202 [1985]; Neuhaus v McGovern, 195 Misc 2d 613, 614 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2002]), barring the commencement of a summary proceeding against the vendee, the equitable owner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbarita v. ShillingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Jacobs v. AndolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Mendoza v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Neuhaus v. McGovernAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koppelman v. BarrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
  2. 363-367 Neptune Ave., LLC v. NearyNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API