Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Paul Arrmtage, for the plaintiff. Fra/nk P. Lawrence [George Burnham, Jr., and Gordon T. Hughes with him on the brief], for the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Hooker, J".:
In this submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts it appears that the plaintiff is the assignee and owner of live judgments recovered against the defendant in the State of North *224.Carolina, by citizens in that State,* in the month of May, 1902. The defendant is a life insurance corporation organized and existing under- the -laws of the State of New York. For many years prior to the 18th day of May, 1899, it :did a regular insurance -business, soliciting insurance, paying claims, and receiving premiums in the State of North Carolina. Chapter 54 of the Public Laws…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Woodward v. . Mutual Reserve Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Birch v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown-Ketcham Iron Works v. George B. Swift Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913