Legal Opinion

Lits v. Philadelphia R. T. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1929No. Appeal 233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an action in trespass for damages for per sonal injuries resulting to plaintiff from a collision between an automobile in which he was riding and one of defendant’s trolley cars. Defendant does not seek a new trial, its sole complaint being that its motion for judgment n. o. v. was refused. Therefore, we accept as established by the verdict every fact supported by the testimony presented by the plaintiff and every fair inference therefrom favorable to him in making the following statement of facts:

Plaintiff was a guest occupying the righthand side of the front…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Bornscheuer v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Kirschbaum v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Griffiths v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Schuchalter v. P. R. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. McGuire v. BrambillaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rogers Et Ux. v. P.R.T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Bahan v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API