Legal Opinion

Bahan v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1935No. Appeals, 133 and 188Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

We have here two appeals from the judgment of the court below. The defendant has appealed from the discharge of its rule for judgment non obstante veredicto; the plaintiff from the discharge of his rule for a new trial, because of the inadequacy of the verdict. We are satisfied that judgment should be entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto because of the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s chauffeur. It follows, automatically, that the plaintiff’s appeal must be dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured in a collision between his automobile, driven by his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dopler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Lits v. Philadelphia R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Widson v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Leiser Gas Stove Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API