Legal Opinion
State v. Marcisz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 2, 2007No. AC 26879PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendant, Franciszek Marcisz, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to find him guilty and (2) the court’s knowledge of a part B information prior to rendering its decision violated his rights to a fair trial and to due process. We disagree and accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*33The following facts are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. GarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Moraski v. Connecticut Board of Examiners of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BereisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. BlakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. WorkmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.