Garges v. Premo
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
**799This case concerns whether the trial court properly dismissed as moot plaintiff's habeas corpus claim alleging serious indifference to his medical needs. The court dismissed the case because plaintiff had been transferred to a different prison. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Garges v. Premo , 284 Or. App. 313, 390 P.3d 1124 (2017). It was uncontested that plaintiff's grievances regarding his medical care were unaffected by the transfer, and that the decision to deny plaintiff the procedures he sought was controlled by a centralized Department of Corrections committee, rather than by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. B. (In Re J. B.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Johnson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- City of Troutdale v. Palace Constr. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. LomackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.