Kelly v. BMO Harris Bank N.A. (In re Peters Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
KATHLEEN H. SANBERG, CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
This adversary proceeding originates from the failure of the Petters Ponzi *158scheme orchestrated by Thomas J. Petters and his associates, the history of which has been well documented in this district as well as others nationwide.1 Liquidating Trustee Douglas A. Kelley (“Plaintiff’) filed this adversary proceeding against BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M & I Marshall and Ilsley Bank (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the Minnesota Uniform Fiduciaries Act (“MUFA”),…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BMO Harris Bank N.A., as Successor to M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank v. KelleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Hughes v. Canadian National Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.