Latham v. Molpus
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentHawkins, Chief Justice
Because the majority, incorrectly applies the existing law to the facts of this case, depriving the electorate of their choice in an election, I must respectfully dissent.
I
Robert C. “Bob” Latham is entitled to be a candidate. Latham was qualified as a substitute candidate under Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-317 (1990 rev.). Like Latham, the majority of the current candidates for the judiciary elections were qualified according to Mississippi law under Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-971 (1990 rev.). The Secretary of State, in his brief, admits that Latham was a qualified candidate under the law existing in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Brenda Curtis v. James R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Meeks v. Tallahatchie CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.