Legal Opinion

Heckler Electric Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marcy S. Friedman, J.

In this action, plaintiff, Heckler Electric Co., Inc. (Heckler), seeks damages for breach of contract. Defendants, City of New York and New York City Transit Authority (City), move for partial summary judgment dismissing the first through fifth causes of action of the complaint.

It is undisputed that plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract for plaintiff’s performance of electrical work on defendants’ construction project; that plaintiff was to complete work under the contract within three years of the date of delivery of the general…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. A.H.A. General Construction, Inc. v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Berley Industries, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Huff Enterprises, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Gemma Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. MRW Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API