Darrah v. Oakland Motor Car Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, J.,
Two bills of indictment, one for perjury and the other for not making and filing a vendee’s statement or purchase affidavit upon purchasing a used automobile, were found against the-plaintiff prior to this action, following the presentation to a magistrate of two affidavits signed by duly authorized employees of defendant company. Verdicts of not guilty were returned in both cases, and this action for malicious prosecution followed.
It appears that the plaintiff bought from one Lee his interest in an automobile which the latter had leased from the defendant company. This occurred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Briggs v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Greenfield v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- McClafferty v. PhilpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- MacDonald v. SchroederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.