Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Mayfield Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1937No. 1650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

S. P. Rushing- and J. C. Falvey by thisl suit sought to recover of Mayfield Company damages for the alleged breach of a writ-' ten contract, dated October 3, 1930. Thej contract purported to obligate the defendant, upon prescribed ’conditions, to deliver to plaintiffs, through an escrow agent, a certain mineral lease; and obligated plaintiffs, upon stated conditions, to pay as consideration therefor the sum of $19,000. The lease was executed (except as to delivery), and in accordance with the pro-, visions of the contract was deposited in escrow in Citizens National Bank…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Heirs of Reddin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Buck v. De ShazoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Lynch Davidson & Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayfield Co. v. RushingTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bauer v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Rios v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. State v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API