Rushing v. Mayfield Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FUNDERBURK, Justice.
S. P. Rushing- and J. C. Falvey by thisl suit sought to recover of Mayfield Company damages for the alleged breach of a writ-' ten contract, dated October 3, 1930. Thej contract purported to obligate the defendant, upon prescribed ’conditions, to deliver to plaintiffs, through an escrow agent, a certain mineral lease; and obligated plaintiffs, upon stated conditions, to pay as consideration therefor the sum of $19,000. The lease was executed (except as to delivery), and in accordance with the pro-, visions of the contract was deposited in escrow in Citizens National Bank…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Heirs of Reddin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Buck v. De ShazoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Lynch Davidson & Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mayfield Co. v. RushingTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Bauer v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Rios v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- State v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965