Legal Opinion
Buck v. De Shazo
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 6, 1928No. 424PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.
The plaintiff in error, F. H. Buck, will be designated plaintiff as in the trial court, and defendant in error, D. W. De Shazo, will be designated as defendant. The suit is for specific performance of the following contract:
“State of Texas, County of Taylor:
“Entered into contract this day 4/21/24, between D. W. De Shazo and F. H. Buck. D. W. De Shazo agrees to sell to F. H. Buck a tract of land lying west of Mrs. F. H. Buck’s place. Beginning at Mrs. F. H. Buck’s S. W. comer extending west to D. W. De Shazo’s west line; extending north to Mrs. F. H. Buck’s west line; east to Mrs. F. H. Buck’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Heirs of Reddin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Moore v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
3Cited by13 opinions
- Langley v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Caprito v. Grisham-Hunter CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Fairfield Financial Group, Inc. v. Gawerc, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Hill v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Lynch Davidson & Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.