Legal Opinion

Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Hanson

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 17, 1987No. Civ. 87-0367-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

CYR, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, Bayside Enterprises, Inc. [Bayside], moves pursuant to rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants, the Maine Agricultural Bargaining Board [MABB] and its members, from enforcing the Maine Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Act of 1973 [MAMBA], Me.Rev. Stat.Ann.tit. 13, §§ 1953-1965 (West 1981 and Supp. 1986-87), as amended, L.D. 912 (1987) [MAMBA amendments], by requiring Bayside to bargain, enter into mediation, submit to arbitration, or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API