Legal Opinion

Mills v. Hamer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1898No. 8214PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Buffalo county. Heard below before Sinclair, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Tbis is an appeal by the defendants from an order confirming tbe sale of their property made under a decree of foreclosure.

It is urged that no notice was given the defendants of the issuance of the order of sale and of the meeting of the appraisers-. The statute requires no such notice to be given, and to hold that the sale is erroneous for want of such notice would be the rankest kind of judicial legislation. It is no valid ground for setting aside the sale that no notice of the time of making the appraisement was given the defendants. (Smith v. Foxworthy, 39 Neb. 214; Iowa Loan & Trust Co.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vought v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Burkett v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ecklund v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smith v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kearney Land & Investment Co. v. AspinwallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoover v. HaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lockwood v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Brown v. FitzpatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bank of Salem v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bank of Salem v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API