Harmon v. Parker
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Willis W. Harmon against Harrison M. Parker for work and labor performed. There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.
This is an action to recover a balance of $116.91 due to plaintiff for his labor as a carpenter. It is admitted that he rendered the services charged for, and that he is entitled to receive the amount claimed. Nor is it denied that he was employed by defendant. The only ultimate issue at the trial was: Whether plaintiff was employed-by defendant acting in his individual capacity, or by him as an officer and agent for a certain company known as “the Fruitvale Company.”
•The work for which plaintiff claims judgment was performed by him at Fruitvale, in this State, and there is evidence tending…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Baranowski v. StratingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. BeckertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Stevens v. GrafMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Detroit Pure Milk Co. v. PattersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.