Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Tri-Continental Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1939PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.
This action to redress wrongs alleged to have been done to Tri-Continental Corporation is brought in its behalf by one of its stockholders. Tri-Continental Corporation is an- investment company that was formed through a consolidation of two like companies. The consolidation was brought about by J. & W. Seligman & Co., a partnership of investment bankers. Because one of the predecessor companies also was named Tri-Continental Corporation, the parties say “ New Tri-Continental ” when they speak of the consolidated company.
The defendants other than New Tri-Continental include: (1) present and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Potter v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Continental Ins. Co. v. . N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by22 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.