Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Howard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

201 Or. 426 (1954)

271 P.2d 1059

FISCHER

v.

HOWARD

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued October 27, 1953.

Reargued March 17, 1954.

Reversed June 17, 1954.

William Schroeder, of Vale, and Roy Kilpatrick, of Canyon City, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Lytle, Kilpatrick & Schroeder, of Vale.

Martin P. Gallagher argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Gallagher & Gallagher, of Ontario.

REVERSED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the circuit court which sustained a motion made by the plaintiff for a new trial. The action in which the challenged order was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API