De Lappe v. Sullivan

No objection is made here to the amount of the judgment rendered by the county court, nor to appellant’s liability therefor; it is conceded that the labor was performed and that appellee was justly entitled to the sum found due him.

*183Defendant below demanded an itemized statement of the account sued on; in response thereto plaintiff furnished the following: “Dec. 5th, 1882. Balance due for work to John Sullivan, $182.65.”

The court overruled defendant’s motion filed under the statute for a more specific bill of particulars or statement. The first assignment of error rests upon this ruling.

The…