Legal Opinion

Schoolfield v. Houle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to District Court of Custer County.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, C.

In this action the plaintiff, Elizabeth Houle, sought to recover possession of certain stock from plaintiff in error, sheriff of the county, which had been attached, on a writ properly issued, as the property of Richard Houle, defendant in error’s husband. Verdict for plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered.

The only question presented on the trial of the cause was whether or not Richard Houle had such an interest in the, property as was subject to levy and attachment. The theory advanced by plaintiff in error is that in 1816 Richard Houle married the defendant in error, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. De Lappe v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moffatt v. TenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Jackson v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Dawson v. CostonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Hayes v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Andrews v. CarlileSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API