Legal Opinion

Barton Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Hamblett

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action of tort for the conversion of a quantity of maple syrup. The facts are agreed to. It appears that on February 10, 1933, before the sugar season had commenced, David and Blanche Gelineau of Charleston, gave the plaintiff a mortgage of the following personal property: ‘ ‘ All the maple products of every kind and description produced on my farm during the season of 1933. And all that may be hereafter produced, * * *. Said property is located at my farm in Charleston, Vermont,” to secure their demand note payable to the plaintiff and dated June 1, 1928, for $3,575.00, which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Mason v. SaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  3. Moncion v. BertrandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Dewey v. St. Albans Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  5. Calkins v. ClementSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Silverman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Johnson v. TuttleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API