Legal Opinion

Kim E. Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2014No. 12-CM-1742 & 12-CM-1743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

The issue on appeal is whether the exclusionary rule applies to derivative evidence? resulting from an arrest warrant that was premised upon tainted evidence obtained during an illegal traffic stop. 1

We hold that where an officer’s mistake of law leads to a warrant premised on tainted evidence, derivative evidence obtained pursuant to that warrant must be excluded, unless there is an independent source for the evidence or sufficient attenuation to “purge the taint.” The traffic stop at issue was premised on a “mistake of law,” namely, that a license plate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. James BumphusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API