Legal Opinion
State v. Marcus
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1969No. 1732PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
David Marcus, a licensed physician, was informed against by the County Attorney of Maricopa County on three counts of illegal sale of narcotic drugs, a violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.02. 1 Defendant duly moved to quash the information, which motion was denied. Shortly before trial, he orally renewed his motion and the trial judge certified this compound question as important and doubtful:
“May a licensed physician who sells drugs (defined as narcotic drugs) in his office to a person whom he is not attending as a patient be found guilty of violating A. R.S. Sec. 36-1002.02…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Whitfield Transportation, Inc. v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Knape v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Gustafson v. RajkovichArizona Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Kearney v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CanezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Avra Valley Fire District v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.