Legal Opinion

Beitler v. Rudkin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 7, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The first four reasons of appeal relate to the charge, and the remaining reason to the action of the court upon the motion to set aside the verdict.

The first assignment is directed to the charge as a whole, in not presenting all the issues to the jury; that it was inadequate and not a sufficient guide to the jury on all the questions of law; that it was too broad, contained matters of law which were “too far fetched,” and did not apply to the issues in said case.

This does not comply with our rule, is not a proper assignment of error, and does not merit our consideration. It should be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
  2. Edmondston v. Drake & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Allen v. RundleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Hine v. McNerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Perkins v. CatlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Mazurkiewicz v. DowholonekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Piascyk v. MalonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API