In re I.A.G.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
A jury found that I.A.G. engaged in delinquent conduct by engaging in organized criminal activity and by committing a terroristic threat.1 The trial court then committed I.A.G. to the Texas Youth Commission for an indeterminate sentence not to exceed his nineteenth birthday. In two issues, I.A.G. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of both of the State’s theories to prove him guilty of delinquent conduct. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Standards of Review
We review adjudications of delinquency in juvenile cases by applying the same standards that we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Swearingen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re R.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In re A.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- In Re Ao, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- in the Matter of A.O., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- in the Matter of A.O., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.